First Impressions and Onboarding
Upon visiting screens.ai, I was redirected to Agiloft Astra's landing page. The interface immediately pitches a free AI contract review tier with no upfront cost. The dashboard is clean and centered on a call to action: joining the waitlist for early access. After signing up, I was guided through a simple onboarding flow that explains the credit system. The tool uses "credits" for analysis tasks, but reviewing and redlining contracts in Microsoft Word consumes no credits, which is a clever differentiator. I tested the free tier by uploading a sample contract; the AI analyzed risk clauses and obligations within seconds. The results are presented in a clear, categorized view that highlights exposures and non-standard terms.
Features and Functionality
The core value lies in two workflows: Contract Analysis and Contract Review. Analysis scans contracts at scale to uncover risks and obligations across a portfolio. Review applies your own standards or expert-built "Screens" to generate redlines in Microsoft Word. This tight integration with Word is a standout — it means teams can work in their familiar environment without switching tools. The technology behind Astra is AI models trained on contract language, capable of identifying clauses like indemnification, termination rights, and data privacy obligations. Custom playbooks allow users to define their own standards, and the free tier lets you create up to three. For deeper insights, the Pro tier ($120/month) offers larger credit buckets (2,500 to 40,000 credits per month) and unlimited custom playbooks. Advanced tier has custom pricing for enterprise-grade needs with SSO and dedicated support.
Pricing and Use Cases
Pricing is transparent: a generous free tier with 1,000 credits per month for analysis, and Pro starts at $120/month with scaling credit options. The credit system can be a double-edged sword: simple questions cost fewer credits, but complex analyses consume more. This may require users to budget credits carefully. The tool is best suited for legal, procurement, finance, and sales teams who routinely review agreements. However, small law firms or solo practitioners might find the free tier limiting for heavy usage. Competitors like Ironclad or Evisort offer similar AI contract review but typically lack a free tier or charge higher per-user fees. Astra's freemium model lowers the barrier to entry, making it ideal for companies that want to test AI contract analysis without upfront investment.
Strengths and Limitations
The main strength is the no-cost entry point and the seamless Word integration — no special skills required. The built-in AI screens are expert-curated, saving time on risk identification. On the downside, the credit system can feel restrictive; heavy analysts may need to upgrade quickly. Also, the tool is currently in early access, so some features may be immature or have limited model accuracy. I noticed that the FAQ section was truncated, suggesting documentation is still being built. Despite this, for teams looking to accelerate contract review without vendor lock-in, Screens (Agiloft Astra) is a compelling option. I recommend it for organizations that want to de-risk contract portfolios before committing to a full CLM suite. Visit Agiloft Astra at https://screens.ai/ to explore it yourself.
Comments